The Scientific publication in Venezuela: crisis and transformations in pursuit of survival
Main Article Content
Abstract
Within the framework of the profound transformations of scientific publishing, Venezuelan journals face a difficult situation because of the sharp fall in local research and the total loss of support from the State. A significant number have been paralyzed or delayed. However, many editors are determined to keep their journals active and, recently, some autonomous universities propose initiatives to prevent the disappearance of publishing activity by adopting new ways of supporting their operation that contribute to adapting to the demands of international repositories and maintaining their continuity, and, subsequently, a review is made of statistical data from national and international repositories and interviews with those responsible for coordinating research in four autonomous universities, editors and researchers from various areas of knowledge. The situation of Venezuelan journals shows a significant drop in their activity, while certain changes begin to be experienced in search of survival. The most notable thing is the change in the profile of the authorships of the articles in some journals, which in 10 years go from being fundamentally national to predominantly foreign.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Acosta de Mavárez, A. (2022). Editorial Educación, emprendimiento, responsabilidad social y crecimiento económico: pilares fundamentales para el desarrollo en América Latina. Revista de ciencias sociales, 28(6), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v28i.38816
Aguado-López, E. & Becerril-García, A. (2016). Producción científica venezolana: apuntes sobre su pérdida de liderazgo en la región latinoamericana. Revista venezolana de gerencia, 21(73), 11-29. Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=29045347002
Aula Abierta (2017). Informe preliminar: deserción universitaria en Venezuela. Recuperado de http://aulaabiertavenezuela.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/AULA-ABIERTA-VENEZUELA-INFORME-PRELIMINAR-DESERCI%C3%93N-UNIVERSITARIA-EN-VENEZUELA.pdf
Aula Abierta (2021). Informe Preliminar: libertad académica y autonomía universitaria en la educación superior venezolana. Referencias a la salud y otros derechos humanos Recuperado de http://aulaabiertavenezuela.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/INFORME-PRELIMINAR-LIBERTAD-ACAD%C3%89MICA-Y-AUTONOM%C3%8DA-UNIVERSITARIA-EN-LA-EDUCACI%C3%93N-SUPERIOR-EN-VENEZUELA.pdf
Beigel, M. F. (2014). Publishing from the periphery: structural heterogeneity and segmented circuits. The evaluation of scientific publications for tenure in Argentina’s CONICET. Current sociology, 62(5).
Beigel, F. & Salatino, M. (2015). Circuitos segmentados de consagración académica: las revistas de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas en la Argentina. Información, cultura y sociedad, 32, 7-31. Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=263039285002
Bell, M. (2007). Technological learning and the development of production and innovative capacities in the industry and infrastructure sectors of least developed countries: what roles for ODA?. SPRU-Science and Technology Policy Research, Sussex: University of Sussex.
Blanco, C. E. & Graffe, G. (2020). Gestión de la divulgación de conocimientos: universidad y revistas especializadas en Venezuela. Mikarimin. Revista científica multidisciplinaria, 6, 29-42.
Consejo Internacional de Ciencias Sociales. (2010). 2010: divisorias del conocimiento. Informe Mundial sobre las Ciencias Sociales. París: UNESCO-CSIC.
Gingras, Y. (2016). Bibliometrics and research evaluation. Uses and abuses. Massachusetts: MIT press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10719.001.0001
Guédon, J. C. (2011). El acceso abierto y la división entre ciencia “principal” y “periférica”. Crítica y emancipación, 3(6), 135-180. Recuperado de http://biblioteca.clacs0.edu.ar/ojs/index.php/critica/article/view/141
IAP InterAcademy Partnership (2022). Combatting predatory journals and conferences. Recuperado de: https://www.interacademies.org/publication/predatory-practices-report-English
Knöchelmann, M. (2020). The Democratization Myth: Open Access and the Solidification of Epistemic Injustices (PreprintMai 2020). Recuperado de https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/hw7at/
Kreimer, P. (2006). ¿Dependientes o integrados? La ciencia latinoamericana y la nueva división internacional del trabajo. Nómadas, 24, 199-212. Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=105116598017
Mercado, A., Ávalos, I., Sánchez-Rose, I., Cervilla, M., López, S. & Vessuri, H. (2020). Capacidades de ciencia, tecnología e innovación para superar la crisis en Venezuela. Technical Report Prepared for the International Development Research Center (IDRC) and the Global Development Network (GDN).
Mercado, A., Sánchez-Rose, I. y Vessuri, H. (2021). Revistas académicas ¿resiliencia o los estertores de la investigación en Venezuela?. Revista Espacios, 42(24), 34-57. https://doi.org/10.48082/espacios-a21v42n24p04
Mirowski, Ph. (2018). The future(s) of open science. Social studies of science, 48(2), 171-203.
Packer, A. (18 de diciembre de 2019). El modelo SciELO de publicación como política pública de acceso abierto. Blog SciELO en Perspectiva. Recuperado de https://blog.scielo.org/es/2019/12/18/el-modelo-scielo-depublicacion-como-politica-publica-de-acceso-abierto/#.Xf5800dKiUk
Ràfols, I. (2019). S&T indicators “in the wild”. Contextualization and participation for responsible metrics. Research evaluation, 28(1), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy030
Robinson-García, N. & Ràfols, I. (2019). The differing meanings of indicators under different policy contexts. The case of internalisation. Preprint. Researchgate 335990226
Ruiz-Corbella, M. (2018). From print to digital publishing: the radical transformation of scientific journals in the social sciences. Revista española de pedagogía, 76(271), 499-517. https://doi.org/10.22550/REP-3-2018-06
Schott, T. (1988). International Influence in science: beyond center and periphery. Social science research, 17(3), 219-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0049-089X(88)90014-2
Schramme, Th. (2019). The future of academic journals?. Ethical theory and moral practice, 22(2). Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333785971_The_Future_of_Academic_Journals
Vessuri, H., Guédon, J. C. & Cetto, A. M. (2014). Excellence or quality? Impact of the current competition regime on science and scientific publishing in Latin America and its implications for development. Current sociology, 62, 647-665. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113512839
Yokoi, K. (2013). The growth of open access journals in relation to the publication of scholarly journals. Library and information science, 70, 143–175.