Reuse of research data: a bibliometric review
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the course of time being observed surveys such as the use of data and surveys were carried out. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), in the mid 1990s, recommended sharing research data with public funding. The research data reuse allows for evidence reanalysis, reproduction and verification of results, minimizing duplication of effort, and leveraging the work of others. With the objective of verifying how the subject seeing being treated by the scientific literature, with the use of the instrument Knowledge Development Process Constructivist(ProKnow-C), 32 references were selected for a representative and qualified bibliographic portfolio, which was analyzed based on bibliometrics.It was possible to verify that Kim was the author who published the most, the journal PLOS ONE was also relevant to the theme. Of the 32 articles selected, 28 received less than 100 citations from Google Scholar. It was also possible to verify that there is a trend of research in information science since the outstanding journals in the bibliographic portfolio are linked to this area of knowledge. The use of Proknow-C proved to be important to identify the most relevant articles on the reuse of research data.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Borgman, C. L., Scharnhorst, A. & Golshan, M. S. (2019). Digital data archives as knowledge infrastructures: Mediating data sharing and reuse. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(8), 888-904. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24172
Chauvette, A., Schick-Makaroff, K. & Molzahn, A. E. (2019). Open data in qualitative research. International journal of qualitative methods, 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918823863
Childs, S., Loma, E., Mcleod, J. & Cook, G. A. (2014). Opening research data: issues and opportunities. Records management journal, 24(2), 142-162. https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-01-2014-0005
Curty, R. G., Crowston, K., Specht, A., Grant, B. W. & Dalton, E. D. (2017). Attitudes and norms affecting scientists’ data reuse. PLOS ONE, 12(12), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189288
Ensslin, L.; Ensslin, S. R. & Pinto, H. M. (2013). Processo de investigação e análise bibliométrica: avaliação da qualidade dos serviços bancários. Revista de administração contemporânea, 17(3), 325-349. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552013000300005
Gregory, K. M. (2020). A dataset describing data discovery and reuse practices in research. Scientific data, 7(232), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0569-5
Joo, S., Kim, S. & Kim, Y. (2017). An exploratory study of health scientists’ data reuse behaviors: examining attitudinal, social, and resource factors. Aslib journal of information management, 69(4), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-12-2016-0201
Lacerda, R. T. O., Ensslin, L. & Ensslin, R. S. (2012). Uma análise bibliométrica da literatura sobre estratégia e avaliação de desempenho. Gestão de produção, 19(1), 59-78. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-530X2012000100005
Park, H. & Wolfram, D. (2017). An examination of research data sharing and re-use: implications for data citation practice. Scientometrics, 111, 443-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2240-2
Perrier, L., Blondal, E. & Macdonald, H. (2020). The views, perspectives, and experiences of academic researchers with data sharing and reuse: a meta-synthesis. PLOS ONE, 15(2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229182
Thanos, C. (2017). Research data reusability: conceptual foundations, barriers and enabling technologies. Publications, 5(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications5010002
Van de Sandt, S., Dallmeier-Tiessen, S., Lavasa, A. & Petras, V. (2019). The definition of reuse. Data science journal, 18(22), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2019-022