Provenance and digital context: contributions from information science
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objective of this article is to discuss the concept of provenance and highlight its importance in the digital environment, focusing on the perspective of Information Science. As methodological procedures, it was characterized by being a qualitative and exploratory research, from a literature review on the context of provenance in different domains. The article presents a discussion of the term provenance in several contexts, such as in Achival Science, Museology, Digital Preservation and Computing, highlighting its importance in the digital sphere. As discussed the relevance of provenance in different contexts, the need for more in-depth studies is highlighted, analyzing whether the instruments to represent provenance are adequate to guarantee the veracity and inalterability of the information. Thus, the discussions exposed in this article reveal possibilities in identifying metadata for each characteristic that the provenance may present, in addition to the feasibility of expansion to other contexts.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Arakaki, F. A. (2019). Metadados administrativos e a proveniência dos dados: modelo baseado na família PROV. Tese Doutorado em Ciência da Informação, Marilia, Brasil. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unesp.br/handle/11449/180490
Arakaki, F. A., Alves, R. C. V., e Santos, P. L. V. A. C. (2019). Preservação digital e proveniência: interseções entre PREMIS e o PROV. Em XX Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Ciência da Informação. ANCIB, Florianópolis, Brasil. Recuperado de https://conferencias.ufsc.br/index.php/enancib/2019/paper/view/1356/647
Arquivo Nacional (Brasil). (2015). Dicionário brasileiro de terminologia arquivística. Rio de Janeiro: Arquivo Nacional. Recuperado de http://www.arquivonacional.gov.br/images/pdf/Dicion_Term_Arquiv.pdf
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J. e Lassila, O. (2001). The semantic web. Scientific American, 284(5), 28–37.
Bivar, B. et al. (2013). Uma Comparação entre os Modelos de Proveniência OPM e PROV. Em BRESCi 2013, Maceió, Brasil.
Buneman, P., Khanna, S. e Tan, W. (2000). Data provenance: some basic issues. En S. Kapoor, S. Prasad (eds), FST TCS 2000: Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science. FSTTCS 2000. Berlin: Springer.
Conselho Internacional de Arquivos. (2007). ISDF: Norma internacional para descrição de funções. Paris: Conselho Internacional de Arquivos. Recuperado de https://www.ica.org/sites/default/files/CBPS_2007_Guidelines_ISDF_First-edition_PT.pdf
Cruz, S. M. S., Campos, M. L. M. e Mattoso, M. (2009). Towards a Taxonomy of Provenance in Scientific Workflow Management Systems. 2009 Congress On Services - I, IEEE. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/services-i.2009.18
Cunha, M. B. e Cavalcanti, C. R. O. (2008). Dicionário de Biblioteconomia e Arquivologia. Brasília: Briquet de Lemos.
Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. (2020). Provenance. DCMI. Recuperado de https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/terms/provenance/
Duranti, L. et al. (2016). InterPARES Trust Terminologia. Recuperado em http://arstweb.clayton.edu/interlex/pt/
Eckert, K. (2012). Metadata Provenance in Europeana and the Semantic Web. (Dissertação Mestrado em Informationswissenschaft). Recuperado de https://edoc.hu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/18452/2727/332.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Eckert, K., Garijo, D. e Panzer, M. (2011). Extending DCAM for Metadata Provenance. Trabalho apresentado no International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, DCMI, The Hague. Recuperado de http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/view/3621
Furner, J. (2019). Definitions of “Metadata”: A Brief Survey of International Standards. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(6). doi: https://10.1002/asi.24295
Haynes, D. (2018). Metadata for Information Management and Retrieval: Understanding metadata and its use. London: Facet Publishing.
Lemieux e inPROVENANCE Group. (2016). Provenance: Past, Present and Future in Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Perspective. In V. Lemieux (ed.). Building Trust in Information (pp. 3-45.. Bern: Springer International Publishing.
Li, C. e Sugimoto, S. (2014). Provenance description of metadata using PROV with PREMIS for long-term use of metadata. Em International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications. The Hague: DCMI. Recuperado de https://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/view/3709
Li, C. e Sugimoto, S. (2017). Provenance description of metadata vocabularies for the long-term maintenance of metadata. Journal of data and information Science, 2(2), 41–55.
Li, C. e Sugimoto, S. (2018). Provenance Description of Metadata Application Profiles for Long-Term Maintenance of Metadata Schemas. Journal of Documentation, 74(1), 36–61, Recuperado em http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/JD-03-2017-0042
Library of Congress e PREMIS Editorial Committee. (2015). PREMIS Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata. Recuperado de http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v3
Macedo, S. (2018). Ascensão de. ‘Proveniência’ na terminografia arquivística de língua portuguesa: prospeção e visualização de (dis)similaridades em termos e definições. Revista ibero-americana de ciência da informação, 11(2), 388–409. Recuperado de http://periodicos.unb.br/ojs311/index.php/RICI/article/view/8334
Marins, A. L. A. (2008). Modelos conceituais para proveniência. (Dissertação Mestrado em Ciência da Informação), Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Recuperado de https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/colecao.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=11880@1
Moreau, L. e Groth, P. (2013). Provenance: an introduction to PROV. Synthesis lectures on the semantic web: theory and technology, 3(4), 1-129. doi: https://10.2200/s00528ed1v01y201308wbe007
Pearce-Moses, R. e Baty, L. A. (2005). A glossary of archival and records terminology. Chicago, IL: Society of American Archivists. Recuperado de http://www.chismechick.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/SAA-Glossary-2005.pdf
Peterson, D. (1996). Forms of Representation: An Interdisciplinary theme for Cognitive Science. Wilshire: Intellect Books.
Santos, P. L. V. A. C. e Vidotti, S. A. B. G. (2009). Perspectivismo e tecnologias de informação e comunicação: acréscimos í ciência da informação? DataGramaZero: revista de ciência da informação, 10(3).
Simmhan, Y. L., Plale, B. e Gannon, D. (2005). A survey of data provenance in e-Science. SIGMOD Record, 34(3), 31-36.
Tognoli, N. B. e Guimarães, J. A. C. (2019). Provenance as a knowledge organization principle. Knowledge organization, 46(7), 558-68. Recuperado de http://www.isko.org/cyclo/provenance
Vidotti, S. A. B. G. et al. (2016). Coleta automática para povoamento de repositórios digitais: conversão de registros utilizando XSLT. Tendências da pesquisa brasileira em ciência da informação, 9(2).
World Wide Web Consortium. (2011). Library Linked Data Incubator Group Final Report. W3C Incubator Group Report. Recuperado de http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/XGR-lld-20111025/
World Wide Web Consortium (2013a). PROV Model Primer. Recuperado de https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-prov-primer-20130430/
World Wide Web Consortium (2013b). PROV-DM: the prov data model. Recuperado de https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/
World Wide Web Consortium (2017). Data on the Web best practices. Recuperado de https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/
Zafar, F. et al. (2017). Trustworthy data: A survey, taxonomy and future trends of secure provenance schemes. Journal of network and computer applications, 94, 50-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2017.06.003