Mobile applications to practice social reading: analysis and evaluation of useful tools

Main Article Content

Taísa Dantas

Abstract

This article aims to understand how mobile applications can be used to assist readers during social reading practice, through the analysis of different available resources, their benefits, and limitations. This study has a descriptive and analytical qualitative methodology approach, based on studies focused on the evaluation of electronic resources. In this case, ten reading applications available on Android and iOS operating systems designed for both tablet and smartphone reading, were evaluated. Was possible to conclude that mobile applications are efficient software to encourage the reader to carry out activities planned within the modality of social reading. Especially in what corresponds to the practice of active reading. On the other hand, was verified that for sharing the reading practice, until now, most of the evaluated applications hold weaknesses. Mainly, to encourage the reader to interact with other readers. The tools are limited to sharing through non-specialized platforms within the context of the book and outside of the application.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dantas, T. (2018). Mobile applications to practice social reading: analysis and evaluation of useful tools. Palabra Clave (La Plata), 7(2), e048. https://doi.org/10.24215/18539912e048
Section
Dossier: Libros electrónicos y lectura digital: los escenarios del cambio

References

Aamri, F. Al, Greuter, S., e Walz, S. P. (2015). Trees of Tales: Designing Playful Interactions to Enhance Reading Experiences. In International Conference onInteractive Technologies and Games (iTAG)(pp. 1–8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/iTAG.2015.13

Adler, M. J., e Doren, C. van. (2001). Cómo leer un libro: una guí­a clásica para mejorar la lectura (2nd ed.). Madrid: Debate S.A.

Codina, L. (2000). Evaluación de recursos digitales en lí­nea. Revista Española de Documentación Cientí­fica, 23(1), 9-44.

Cordón Garcí­a, J. A., Alonso Arévalo, J., Gómez Dí­az, R., e Linder, D. (2013). Social Reading: Platforms, Applications, Clouds and Tags. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.

Dantas, T., Mangas-Vega, A., Goméz-Dí­az, R., e Cordón-Garcí­a, J. A. (2017). Reading research and digital reading research: An overview of the current scientific scenario. Informação & Sociedade: Estudos, 27(2), 117-131.

Dantas, T. R. (2017). O leitor social e o desenvolvimento da leitura a partir dos experimentos da Fundación Germán Sánchez Ruipérez. Universidad de Salamanca.

Garcí­a-Rodrí­guez, A., e Gómez-Dí­az, R. (2015). Las demasiadas aplicaciones: parámetros e indicadores para seleccionar las TopAPP de lectura para niños. Anales de Documentación, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.6018/analesdoc.18.2.227071

Gómez-Dí­az, R. (2012). La evaluación de las aplicaciones de lectura. Em J.-A. Cordón-Garcí­a, F.,R. Carbajo-Cascón,

Gómez-Dí­az, e J. Alonso-Arévalo (Eds.), Libros Electrónicos y Contenidos Digitales En La Sociedad Del Conocimiento: Mercado, Servicios Y Derechos, pp. 291-304. Madrid: Pirámide.

Gómez Dí­az, R., Garcí­a Rodrí­guez, A., e Cordón Garcí­a, J. A. (2015). APPrender a leer y escribir: Aplicaciones para el aprendizaje de la lectoescritura. Teorí­a de La Educación, 16(4), 118-137. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks2015164118137

Grzeschik, K., Kruppa, Y., Marti, D., e Donner, P. (2011). Reading in 2110 – reading behavior and reading devices: a case study. The Electronic Library, 29(3), 288-302. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471111141052

Guillén Rí­os, J., e Ayuso Garcí­a, M. (2014). Propuesta teórico-metodológica para evaluar la calidad de bases de datos: aplicación al ámbito de enfermerí­a. Anales de Documentación, 17(2), 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesdoc.17.2.200691

Kang, M., e Eune, J. (2012). Design Framework for Multimodal Reading Experience in Cross-Platform Computing Devices – Focus on a Digital Bible. Em DRS 2012 conference proceedings. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.

Lebert, M. (2008). Project Gutenberg (1971-2008). Disponí­vel em: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/27045

Li, W., e Wu, Y. (2017). Adolescents’ social reading: Motivation, behaviour, and their relationship. Electronic

Library, 35(2), 246-262. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-12-2015-0239

Library of Congress. (2000). The Gutenberg Bible. Disponí­vel em: https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/bibles/the-gutenberg-bible.html

Mangas-Vega, A. (2016). Los derechos del lector digital: revisión sistemática de la literatura. Métodos de Información, 7(13), 213-245. https://doi.org/10.5557/IIMEI7-N13-213245

Mangen, A. (2008). Hypertext fiction reading: haptics and immersion. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(4), 404-419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.00380.x

Orosa, B. G., e Garcí­a, X. L. (2016). Digital books rely on social reading to find new success proposals and formats. Anales de Documentación, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.6018/analesdoc.19.2.246351

Palilonis, J., e Bolchini, D. (2015). Active reading behaviors in tablet-based learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 24(3), 235-261.

Patón-Rodrí­guez, N., e Gómez-Dí­az, R. (2016). La evaluación de las aplicaciones de lectura web: un paso más en el proceso de editorialización de la web. Álabe, 14, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.15645/Alabe2016.14.5

Pearson, J., Buchanan, G., Thimbleby, H., e Jones, M. (2012). The Digital Reading Desk: A lightweight approach to digital note-taking. Interacting with Computers, 24(5), 327-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2012.03.001

Pilcher, J. (2016). Mobile Apps for Educational Purposes. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 32(5), E15-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/NND.0000000000000287

Richardson Jr, J. V, e Mahmood, K. (2012). eBook readers: user satisfaction and usability issues. Library Hi Tech, 30(1), 170-185. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831211213283

Romero, N. (2012). Social reading and the creation of customer loyalty clubs or communities to improve communication with our users and reduce costs in marketing and advertising. Bottom Line, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/08880451211256388

Rowberry, S. P. (2016). Commonplacing the public domain: Reading the classics socially on the Kindle. Language and Literature, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947016652782

Sam-Anlas, C. A., e Stable-Rodrí­guez, Y. (2016). Evaluación de la accesibilidad web de los portales del Estado en Perú. Revista Española de Documentación Cientí­fica, 39(1), e120. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2016.1.1213

Schrock, K. (2016). Critical evaluation of mobile apps. Disponí­vel em: http://www.ipads4teaching.net/critical-eval-of-apps.html/

Tveit, í…. K., e Mangen, A. (2014). A joker in the class: Teenage readers’ attitudes and preferences to reading on different devices. Library & Information Science Research, 36(3–4), 179-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2014.08.001

Vázquez, J. A., & Celaya, J. (2010). Derechos de los lectores de libros digitales. Disponí­vel em http://www.dosdoce.com/2010/05/30/derechos-de-los-lectores-de-libros-digitales/

Vlieghe, J., Muls, J., e Rutten, K. (2016). Everybody reads: Reader engagement with literature in social media environments. Poetics, 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2015.09.001